They're larger on average, but brown bears can get bigger. The kodiak is probably the best bet. And two gorillas aren't going to be enough. Make it five or six, at least. Perhaps more.

Really?!

NO WAY?!

Though, Polar bears are much more carnivorous, and a lot more dangerous, so if Rinso wants pure carnage, polar bear's definitely his best bet.

Just thought I'd mention that the second way of spelling gorilla is the correct one, in case you were unsure, Roman.

Mrs G
The Garner who cares.

Kodiak bears are the biggest, I thought. But polar bears are indeed the fiercest. They fight orca whales and walruses! Possibly at the same time!

Mrs G
The Garner who cares.

I'd go for gorilla, I know chimps can rip your arms clean off no worries, so a bigger ape must be well hard.

Dragon's Kingdom - Stop typing "alot" when you mean "a lot"! - Disappointed

*reminds self not to drink coffee when reading posts* Where's that spare keyboard??

'Anyone' being singular, anyone should 'know' rather than 'knows'. Just to clear that up, Roman.

Mrs G
The Garner who cares.

Kodiak bears are brown bears. They're a subspecies of brown bear, just like grizzly bears, as opposed to a species in their own right.

Actually, brown bears and polar bears are also very closely related, and can produce fertile crossbreeds, though their different lifestyles and territories tend to prevent this from happening.

No problemo. I think I'll load up Word now. Better safe than sorry, and all that.

Anticipate charity by preventing poverty. - Rabbi Moshe ben-Maimon

Pff, next thing you'll be telling me that Bookworms aren't books!

(Playing blind Pictionary, me drawing)
Ella: Is it a giraffe?
Me (stops drawing): No
Ella: Star Trek?
Me: Yes!

Again, a lot of the problem here is behavioral. Gorillas simply don't act like predators. Their defense relies largely on bluff and escape. They aren't as agressive as humans or chimpanzees. They're big enough that there aren't too many animals that can harm them. Really, a chimpanzee would probably be better able to defend itself, even though they aren't quite as strong as a gorilla. They act agressive, they think agressively. Gorillas just don't. And while gorillas are strong, so are bears. A brown bear can break a tiger's back in one swipe, easy. And they're tough. They're built fairly compactly, with a lot of thick fur and fat to protect their vulnerable spots.

Wow. This impresses me. GO BEARS!

What if the Gorzillas had been injected with some kind of rage drug to make them as aggressive as possible.

I don't like chimps, according to channel 5 they eat babies.

Then they might hurt the bears some before the bears wreaked holy vengeance upon them. Bears just don't have enough weaknesses and gorillas don't have enough weapons. One is made for killing. The other isn't.

I think i'll go with bear. Not that i really have any idea, but i just like bears better
And i think Ba has a good point about bears having better tactics and being more aggressive, so, the bear.