I spotted this article on the BBC News site
HERE
Here is my ironic view of matters...
Now I know the old joke about 'How can you tell when an official spokesperson is lying? - Because their lips are moving!', here is a classic example.
I'm all for security at airports or indeed anywhere large crowds of people are vunerable but this is the '
best idea yet'. Yeah... right...
Sarah Barrett, head of customer experience at the airport, has given us the full benefit of her technological wisdom.
Quote:
|
..most passengers did not like the traditional "pat down" search.
|
I live in hope that one day I will be forced to face the good looking 25 year old blonde female customs officer instead of the ugly guy with a face like a melted rubber dog toy.
Quote:
|
...They work by beaming electromagnetic waves on to passengers while they stand in a booth. A virtual three-dimensional image is then created from the reflected energy. Ms Barrett said the radiation levels were "super safe"...
|
How many times has the government warned us about frying our brains with the radiation off a small mobile phone?
What will it do to passengers with pacemakers?
Quote:
|
The images are not erotic or pornographic and they cannot be stored or captured in any way...
|
followed by...
Quote:
|
...the black-and-white image would only be seen by one officer in a remote location before it was deleted
|
How? If its impossible to store the image in the first place?
Quote:
|
Passengers can go through this machine 5,000 times a year each without worrying. The amount of radiation transmitted is tiny.
|
If my maths are any good, 5000 x tiny = fairly large.
Maybe I'll find an article that will give some information that will be objective and actually one-sided in it's views.
Maybe not...
