![]() |
The Terry Pratchett Books Message Board welcomes visitors to the Discworld, Terry Pratchett Novels and literary enthusiasts. |
| |||||||||
|
||||
|
I like the subject of the essay.
You should mention the golems, Grace. The golems essentially believe/believed in humans - their creators and slavers, but they are incapable of moving toward any of their goals on their own due to their rigid life system - "the words in their head". So, in turn, the golems created a king - a focus for all their wants and dreams, an emulation Great Human to resolve their issues. He is the symbol for them - they didn't have one, so they created it. The symbol failed, and the golems began destroying themselves in their inability to handle what their dreams had become. The process only ended when Carrot gave Dorfl freedom - the ability to own himself, which gave Dorfl the option of self-belief rather than remaining focused on Meshuggah the Golem King. Incidentally, Meshuggah means Insane in Hebrew, a further reflection on how the Golem King was in the end, merely another golem driven insane by becoming the focus of all the wants and dreams of the golems. Dorfl destroyed Meshuggah when he began believing in himself. Until then, he was entirely powerless. |
|
||||
|
Excellent point, Roman. And it's interesting the way the golems develop individuality only once they believe in themselves.
Would it be fair to say that Meshuggah went mad because too much belief was focused on him? Although that raises the question of why too much belief doesn't send the gods mad. Or perhaps it does. The Garner who cares. |
|
|||
|
Moving this to Boardania because I think it's applicable to all discworld novels, and pratchett's writing in general. Plus more people might be inclined to comment on it in the main forum.
also, by way of my usual tangental crash into any topic - i'm sure there's a name for it, but i haven't a clue what it is; the philosophical thesis that our perception of the world around us is filtered through our belief in what we see. eg, how do we know that the colour i see as 'red' is the same colour you see as 'red'? as long as we're both consistently seeing the same shade independently of each other, we're still referring to it as 'red' if that's what we think 'red' is. also, we know that memory is failable. eye witness testimony can be radically alterted through suggestion and misdirection, resulting in very clear concrete beliefs of a given witnessed situation that do not bear strong resemblance to each other. i guess what i'm getting at is just how 'real' and dependable is 'belief', or faith or whatever. i used to be crippled by occasional moments of ontological catastrophy where i would suddenly be unsure if i actually knew anything. i still get this from time to time, but thankfully not nearly so often, but let me illustrate from a school days example. my mother would drive to school to collect me in a compact silver honda civic. now, i know the colour of the car, the make and model, and the appearance of the driver, and i understand all this quite well. however, i also didn't trust my memory and my perceptions, and i knew even at a young age that i couldn't recognize faces that well. and so, standing there by the car pool area, i would time and time again be struck with the terror and potential humiliation that i might go up to the wrong silver car, or think i'd seen mom and approach the wrong person. this fear would ultimately cause me to question my perception and recognitions even further, resulting in a complete breakdown of any certitude about any knowledge whatsoever. flash forward nearly 20 years and i'm driving home one night when i realize the car in front of me has taken every turn i would have taken, and we're now off all main roads and into some side streets that really only lead to my neighbourhood... or, you know, the shortcut access to another main road... suddenly the panic hits me, what if i don't really live there? what if it's actually 2025 and i've just had some sort of flashback relapse to a time when i lived in this neighborhoud twenty years ago and i'm about to blithely pull up to someone else's driveway and try my key in a lock that doesn't work and i'll have to explain that of COURSE i live here... don't i? and i won't have any memory of where i really do belong or live and... at about this time the car in front of me turns onto that main road that i've forgotten about and i get something of a grip on myself. but it's still there... i still have this fundamental crack in my understanding of what belief and memory can provide us. i am a flawed mind, living in a flawed world. how do i *know* anything? ... so yeah, nice essay, honey. if anyone needs me I'm going to be hiding under the bed and trying not to choke to death on dust bunnies. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Muahahahaha!!!!! |
|
||||
|
I have to process this a bit and put some thought in it, but I thought it would look good right next to the "Romance in Discworld" - discussion.
I'll think I want to take a closer look at Boffo and Small Gods. I haven't looked at my old Discworld novels in ages, it seems - there was so much to read I felt guilty rereading things, even though someone once said that only re-reading is good reading... |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|